A study of State-based social assistance provision and its Influence on the developmental character of the South Afrcan State: the case of the child support grant

Auteurs-es

CHAGUNDA, Chance Arisitaliko
stagiaire

Mots-clés :

Social services, child care services,, social welfare, state intervention, poverty, unemployment,, aids,, social policy, economic policy, South Africa

Synopsis

This thesis aims at exammmg the extent to which state-based social assistance provision, in the
form of Child Support Grant (CSG), influences the character of a developmental state. Social
assistance provision is understood to be part of a developmental state response to the needs of its
citizens.

I have argued in this thesis that CSG influences the characteristics of a developmental state in as
far as it is available to all needy children who pass the means-test regardless of race. I hold the
view that the developmental approach to social policy should be of great assistance in a country
such as South Africa where there is mass poverty by meeting people's needs in a short to medium
term but also enabling them to depend on themselves in a long term.

The history of the policy context in South Africa and three approaches to social policy have been
examined. These are residual, institutional and normative approaches. My emphasis has been on the
approach that best suits the developmental state. I argue that the developmental state that applies
a normative approach will address issues related to the eradication of poverty, poor economic
opportunities as well as social deprivation and promotes self-reliance. South Africa's
conceptualisation of social policy and social welfare is in keeping with a developmental state. The
problem however, is the implementation of social policy and social welfare provision.

In this thesis I have focused on four research questions and these are:
• Can the CSG illustrate an appropriate social policy intervention of a developmental state in the
context of mass poverty?
• Is South Africa's conceptualisation of social policy and social welfare in keeping with a
developmental state?
• What impact does social assistance provision, in the form of a CSG, have on poor households?
• Can such impact together with other policy interventions contribute to lifting people out of
poverty and building their developmental capacity?

I have used both qualitative and quantitative to examine these questions. My findings show that
social assistance in the form of CSG is consistent with the developmental approach to social
welfare.

##plugins.themes.clarte.stats.title##

##plugins.themes.clarte.metrics.views##
85
##plugins.themes.clarte.stats.downloads##
12

##plugins.themes.clarte.cites.title##

0 ##plugins.themes.clarte.cites.many##

##plugins.themes.clarte.cites.source##

Références

  1. African National Congress, (1994). The Reconstruction and Development Programme- A policy
  2. framework. Johannesburg: Umanyano Publications.
  3. ACESS, (2006). Extend the Child Support Grant to 18. Fact Sheet. Cape Town: ACESS.
  4. Amnesty International Report 2005 (2005). The state of the world's human rights.
  5. London: Amnesty International Publications.
  6. Babbie, E and Mouton, J (2001). The Practice of Social Research, Oxford University Press.
  7. Bless, A (1997). Social Research Methods. Cape Town: Juta Publications.
  8. Bonino, J. M (1975). Doing Theology in Revolutionary Situation. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.
  9. Booysen, F (2003b). The Role of Social Grants in Mitigating the Socio-Economic Impact ofHIVIAIDS:
  10. Evidencefrom the Free State Province. CSSR Working Paper No.56. Centre for Social Science Research,
  11. University of Cape Town: Cape Town.
  12. Budlender, D; Rosa, Sand Hall, K (2005). At ail Costs? Applying the means test for the Child
  13. Support Grant. Children's Institute and Centre for Actuarial Research­ University of Cape Town;
  14. Cape Town.
  15. Bray, R (2002). Missing Links? An Examination of Contributions made by social surveys to our
  16. understanding of child well-being in South Africa. Cape Town: University of Cape Town, CSSR Working
  17. Paper No.23.
  18. Brundtland Report-(1987). The World Commission on Environment and Development-
  19. Burman, S (2004). A Comparative study of the impact of Social Assistance on Women before and after
  20. in Proceedings of the Gender and Social Security Seminar.
  21. http://www.law.wits.ac.za/cals/qender%20and%20social%20security.pdf
  22. Caelers, D., Sylvester, E and Gano, E (2001). "Quarter of Western Cape families starving". Jn Cape
  23. Argus, May 28:1.
  24. Camay, P and Gordon, A.J (2004). Evolving Democratic Governance in South Africa.
  25. Johannesburg: The Co-operative for Research and Education
  26. Cassiem, S and Kgamphe, L (2004). Budgeting and service delivery in programmes targeted at the
  27. child's right to social services: The case of the Child Support Grant. In Erika Coetzee and Judith
  28. Streak (eds), Monitoring Child Socio-Economic Rights in
  29. South Africa: Achievements and Challenges. IDASA: Cape Town.
  30. Cassiem, S (2001). Budgetingfor child socio-economic rights: government obligations and the child's
  31. right to social security and education. Cape Town: IDASA.
  32. Carlos, B (2004). Social Democratic State. www.ingentaconnect.com/content/oso/
  33. Centre for Disease Control and Prevention. Fertility, Poverty and Gender in South Africa.
  34. http:www.hsrcpress.ac.za/user-uploads. ·
  35. Chagunda, C (2006). MTBPS. Briefing Paper 150. Catholic Parliamentary Liaison Office: Cape Town.
  36. Chagunda, C & Pothier, M. (2005). The State of Nation-Address by President Thabo Mbeki. Cape Town:
  37. CPLO.
  38. Chagunda, C (2003). Budget Review 2003/04. Catholic Parliamentary Liaison Office: Cape Town.
  39. Chagunda, C (2002). The Contribution of the Church to Human Development in Third World Countries: a
  40. comparison of initiatives in South Africa and lndia. MTh Thesis. Pietermaritzburg: University of
  41. Natal
  42. Chelf, C.P. (1992). Controversial Issues in Social Welfare Policy: Government and the Pursuit of
  43. Happiness. London: Sage Publications.
  44. Cheng, T, Haggard, Sand Kang, D (1996). Institutions, Economie Policy and Growth in the Republic of
  45. Korea and T(liwan Province of China. Geneva: UNCTAD.
  46. City of Cape Town, (2005). Social Economie Profile of Khayelitsha.
  47. www.capetown.gov.za
  48. Cloete, F and Wissink, H. (eds). (2000). Jmproving Public Policy. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.
  49. Coetzee, E and Streak, J (eds) (2004). Monitoring Child Socio-Economic Rights in South Africa:
  50. Achievements and Challenges. Cape Town: Idasa.
  51. Cook, G. P (2001). Khayelitsha: New settlement forms in the Cape Peninsula. In the Apartheid City
  52. and Beyond:urbanization and social change in South Africa. Ed. Smith,
  53. D.M. London: Witwatersrand University Press.
  54. David, G (1988). Social Development and Social Rights: The Role of Social Work Education. Selected
  55. papers of XXIV congress of the International Association of Schools of Social Work, Vienna,
  56. Austria.
  57. Department ofHealth, (2000). National Food Consumption Survey 1999. Available at
  58. http://www.sahealthinfo.org/nutrition/foodconsumption.htm.
  59. De Vaus, D (2003). Research Design in Social Research. London: SAGE Publication
  60. Devereux, S (2000). Social Safety Nets for Poverty Alleviation in Southern Africa.
  61. Institute of Development Studies.
  62. De Vos, A (ed) (1998). Research at Grassroots: A Primer for the Caring Professions.
  63. Pretoria: Van Schaik
  64. Dewar, D and Watson, V (1990a). An overview of development problems in the Cape Town Metropolitan
  65. Area. Cape Town: Urban Problems Research Unit.
  66. Dunleavy, P. and O'Leary, B., (1987) Theories of the State. London: Macmillan.
  67. DiNitto, D. M and Oye, T. R (1983). Social Welfare: Politics and Public Policy.
  68. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
  69. Dyantyi, Retal (1998). Local Economie Development Initiatives. Cape Town: Urban Problems Research
  70. Unit.
  71. Economie Policy Research Institute (EPRI), (2004). The Social and Economie Impact of South
  72. Africa'sSocial Security System-Commissioned by the Department of Social Development Cape Town: EPRI
  73. Esping-Andersen, G (2001). A Welfare State for the 21ˢᵗ Century in Giddens, A. The Global Third Way
  74. Debate. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  75. FFC, (2003). Financial and Fiscal Commission: "Towards a Review of the Intergovernmental Fiscal
  76. Relations System". Midrand: FFC.
  77. Follentine, S (2004). Towards a common conceptual understanding of developmental social welfare and
  78. its implications for practise. Paper presented at the national conference for social service
  79. practitioners, Dialogue across Disciplines: Partnerships in Development. Pretoria
  80. Freedom Charter. (1955). A.frican National Congress. www.anc.org.za
  81. Gaidzanwa, R. (ed) (2001). Policy Making Issues in Southern A.frica. : Temur Enterprise (Pty) Ltd
  82. Giddens, A. (2001). The Global Third Way Debate. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  83. Gil, D. G (1992). Unravelling Social Policy. Rochester, Vermont: Schenkman Books
  84. Goldblatt, B (2004). The Right to Social Assistance and Gender: A Study of the Implementation of
  85. the Child Support Grant in Proceedings of the Gender and Social Security Seminar.
  86. http://www.law.wits.ac.za/cals/gender%20and%2Dsocial%20security.pdf
  87. Gumede, W. M (2005). Thabo Mbeki and the Battle for the Soul of the ANC. Cape Town: Zebra Press.
  88. Gutierrez, G 1973. A Theology of Liberation. London: SCM Press.

Téléchargements

##catalog.published##

juillet 4, 2023

Séries

Renseignements à propos de cette monographie

Dimensions physiques

##plugins.themes.clarte.press.citeBook##

APA Arisitaliko, C. C. (2023). A study of State-based social assistance provision and its Influence on the developmental character of the South Afrcan State: the case of the child support grant. CODESRIA. https://doi.org/10.57054/codesria.pub.743

##plugins.themes.clarte.press.shareBook##