Farm Level Institutions in Emergent Communities in Post Fast Track Zimbabwe : Case of Mazowe District
Keywords:
Land reform, farms, farming systems, Mazowe, ZimbabweSynopsis
The thesis seeks to understand how emerging communities borne out of the Fast Track Land Reform Programme in Zimbabwe have been able to ensure social cohesion and social service provision using farm level institutions. The Fast Track Programme brought together people from diverse backgrounds into new communities in the former commercial farming areas. The formation of new communities meant that, often, there were ‗stranger households‘ living next to each other. Since 2000, these people have been involved in various processes aimed at turning clusters of homesteads into functioning communities through farm level institutions. Fast track land reform precipitated economic and political crisis in Zimbabwe characterised by a rapidly devaluating Zimbabwean dollar, enormous inflation and high unemployment figures. This economic crisis has impacted heavily on new farmers who find it increasingly difficult to afford inputs and access loans. They have formed social networks in response to these challenges, taking the form of farm level institutions such as farm committees, irrigation committees and health committees. The study uses case studies from small-scale ‗A1 farmers‘ in Mazowe District which is in Mashonaland Central Province. It employs qualitative methodologies to enable a nuanced understanding of associational life in the new communities. Through focus group discussions, in-depth interviews, narratives, key informant interviews and institutional mapping the study outlines the formation, taxonomy, activities, roles, internal dynamics and social organisation of farm level institutions. The study also uses secondary data collected in 2007-08 by the Centre for Rural Development in the newly resettled areas in Mazowe. The major finding of the study is that farmers are organising in novel ways at grassroots levels to meet everyday challenges. These institutional forms however are internally weak, lacking leadership with a clear vision and they appear as if they are transitory in nature. They remain marginalised from national and global processes and isolated from critical connections to policy makers at all levels; thus A1 farmers remain voiceless and unable to have their interests addressed. Farm level institutions are at the forefront of the microeconomics of survival among these rural farmers. They are survivalist in nature and form, and this requires a major shift in focus if they are to be involved in developmental work. The institutions remain fragmented and compete amongst themselves for services from government without uniting as A1 farmers with similar interests and challenges.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
AAPG, 2009. Land in Zimbabwe: Past Mistakes, Future Prospects, All Africa Parliamentary
Group, London.
Adler, P.S. and Kwon, S.W. 2002. Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept, Academy of
Management Review, Vol. 27 (1), pp. 17-40.
Alexander, J. 1994. State, Peasantry and Resettlement in Zimbabwe, Review of African Political
Economy, Vol. 21 (61), pp. 325-245.
Alexander, J. 2006. The Unsettled Land: State Making and Politics of Land in Zimbabwe 1893 – 2003,
Harare: Weaver Press.
Alexander, J., McGregor, J. and Ranger T. 2000. Violence and Memory: 100 years in the ‘Dark
Forests’ of Matabeleland, Oxford: James Currey.
Amin, A. 2005. Local Community on Trial, Economy and Society 34, pp. 612–33.
Andrew, N. and Sadomba, W. 2006: Zimbabwe. Land Hunger and the War Veteran Led Occupations Movement
in 2000, Critique Internationale, Vol. 31, pp. 126–144.
Arrighi, G. 1973. Labour Supplies in Historical Perspective: A Study of the Proletarianisation of
the African Peasantry in Rhodesia, in G. Arrighi and J. S. Saul (eds), Essays on the Political
Economy of Africa, New York: Monthly Review Press.
Barr, A. 2004. Forging Effective New Communities: The Evolution of Civil Society in Zimbabwean
Resettlement Villages, World Development, Vol. 32 (10), pp. 1753-1766.
Bayart, J., Ellis, S. and Hibou, B. 1999. The Criminalization of the State in Africa, Oxford: James Currey Press.
Bebbington, A. 2002. Sharp Knives and Blunt Instruments: Social Capital in Development Studies, Antipode. Vol. 34 (4), pp. 800-803.
Bebbington, A. 2007. Social Capital and Development Studies II: Can Bourdieu Travel to Policy? Progress in Development Studies, Vol. 7 (2), pp. 155–62.
Bebbington, A.J. and Carroll, T. 2000. Induced Social Capital and Federations of the Rural Poor, Social Capital Initiative Working Paper No. 19, Available from, http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTSOCIALCAPITAL/Resources/Social-Capital-Initiative-Working-Paper-Series/SCI-WPS-19.pdf [Accessed 13 May 2009].
Becker, G. 1996. Accounting for Tastes, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Berger, D. 2006. Shaping the Public Sphere With and Beyond the State: Globalisation and Latin American Social Movements Remake State-Publics Relationship, Javanost - The Public, Vol. 13 (4), pp. 45–62.
Berry, S. 1993. No condition is Permanent: The Social Dynamics of Agrarian Change in sub-Saharan Africa. Madison; London: University of Wisconsin Press.
Bierschenk, T. and Olivier de Sardan J. P. 1997. Local Powers and a Distant State in Rural Central African Republic, Journal of Modern African Studies, Vol. 35 (3), pp. 44–68.
Blackenburg von, P. 1994. Large Commercial Farmers and Land Reform in Africa: The Case of Zimbabwe, London: Ashgate.
Bond, P. and Manyanya, M. 2003. Zimbabwe’s Plunge: Exhausted Nationalism, Neoliberalism and the Search for Social Justice, Harare: Weaver Press.
Bourdieu P. 1980. Le sens pratique, Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.
Bourdieu P. 1983. Economic Capital, Cultural Capital and Social Capital. Soziale-Welt p. 2.
Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique, of the Judgment of Taste, London: Routledge.
Bourdieu, P. 1986. The Forms of Capital in J.G. Richardson (ed) Handbook of Theory and Research in the Sociology of Education, New York: Greenwald Press.
Bourdieu, P. and Wacquant, L. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P. 1993. The Field of Cultural Production, New York: Columbia University Press.
Bourdillon, M. 1987. The Shona Peoples, Gweru: Mambo Press.
Bourdillon, M., Hebinck, P., Hoddinott, J., Kinsey, B., Maronto, J., Mudege, N. and Owens, T. 2003. Assessing the Impact of HYV Maize in Resettlement Areas of Zimbabwe. FCND Discussion Paper No 161. Washington DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
Brandell, C. E. 2003. Public Discourse and Social Capital: An Assessment of Open, Honest, and Fair in One’s Community Public Deliberation Processes, unpublished PhD dissertation, Western Michigan University.
Briggs, X. S. 1998. Brown Kids in White Suburbs: Housing Mobility and the Many Faces of Social Capital, Housing Policy Debate, Vol. 9 (1), pp. 177-221.
Buckle, C. 2001. African Tears: The Zimbabwe Land Invasions, Harare: Covos Day Books. Burt, R.S. 2000. The Network Structure of Social Capital in R. Sutton and B.M. Staw (eds) Research in Organizational Behaviour. New York: JAI Press.
Butler, T. and Robson, G. 2001. Social Capital, Gentrification, and Neighbourhood Change in London: A Comparison of Three South London Neighbourhoods, Urban Studies, Vol. 38, pp. 2145–2162.
