From Description to Standard Orthography and Pedagogic Grammar in the Revitalisation Process of Endangered Languages : the case of "Bembele"

Authors

DJOMENI, Gabriel Delmon

Keywords:

Culture, african languages, linguistics, bantu languages, Bembele language, orthography, phonology, morphology, syntax, grammar

Synopsis

This work entitled “From Description to Standard Othography and Pedagogic Grammar in the Revitalisation Process of Endangered Languages: the case of Bә̀mbәlә̀” Bantu (A40) aims at showing how a language could be efficiently revitalised by describing, establishing orthographic principles, organising literacy activities and proposing teaching materials like the pedagogical grammar, through the immersion of the researcher in the natural milieu of the language. The work focuses on Bә̀mbәlә̀. The analysis of the study passes through the different stages of language description, language standardisation and development, and the total immersion of the researcher in the community of the language he is studying. Furthermore, to be systematic, the contents have been divided in two main parts. The first part of the work deals with language description. Through the structural approach, the phonological, morphological and syntactic systems of the language are established. Bә̀mbәlә̀ has 15 phonemic vowels, 48 phonemic consonants and 4 tonemes made up of 2 level tones (High, Low) and 2 contour tones (HL, LH), with V, CV and CVC syllable structures, the most prominent in the language. Based on the agreement pattern generated by the head noun in a syntactic chain, mainly on its modifiers, we arrived at the conclusion that the language has 8 noun classes, although Guthrie argues that Bantu (A) languages cannot have less than 10 classes. Bә̀mbәlә̀ organises and expresses the different actions on the axis of the present, the past and the future. Each period is characterised by at least one tense. Tense, aspect and mood are so linked in the language that their separation could lead to some incongruities. As an SVO language, a Bә̀mbәlә̀ complete simple sentence can be made up of an NP, a VP and (PP). The last constituent, notably the (PP), is most often optional, a superfluous constituent whose suppression could not affect sentence grammaticality, although it could affect its semantic core to an extent. The second part of the work focuses on standardisation, immersion approach and pedagogical grammar. Here, the examination of the writing system of the language reveals that it is composed of 35 graphemes made up of vowels, consonants and tones. The whole writing and reading principles of the language are elaborated through the choice of a standard reference dialect: manyɔ̀k spoken in Bibey. The total immersion approach adopted for the promotion of the standard model developed has allowed the training of local people in reading and writing their language and to set a provisional frame of reference which will enable them to protect the norms, and to promote the language. This approach and the training of community members, have led to the elaboration of the guidelines for writing a pedagogic grammar in African languages. The guidelines are then followed by the production of a sample of the pedagogic grammar of the language under revitalisation. The work shows that the researcher, together with the native linguistic community within / with which he is working, must work hand in hand to consolidate and reinforce the revitalisation of the language. The outcome of such a piece of research is three dimensionally beneficial: first and foremost to the linguistic community, then to the researcher and finally to the scientific community. In sum, this work is a sound contribution to the search for a model for elaborating pedagogic grammars from descriptive grammars.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ANYANWU, R-J. 2008. Fundamentals of phonetics, phonology and tonology. PETER LANG, Frankfurt am Main.

ASSOUMOU, J. 2007. “Pour une intégration des langues nationales dans l’enseignement’’. In AJAL N°5, CLA, Yaoundé. pp 5 -31.

AYUK OBEN, M. 2007. The acquisition of the morphosyntax of Kenyang. Maîtrise dissertation, University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé.

BAKER, M. C. 2001. The Atoms of Language: The Mind’s Hidden Rules of Grammar. New- York: Basic Books.

BITJAA KODY, Z.D. 2000. ‘‘Attitudes et représentations linguistiques à Yaoundé’’. In African Journal of Applied Linguistics, N°2, pp100-124.

------------------------------2004. Dynamique des langues camerounaises en contact avec le français (approche macrosociolinguistique). Thèse de Doctorat d’Etat en Linguistique, Université de Yaoundé I, Yaoundé.

BLEEK, W. H. I. 1862. A comparative grammar of South African languages. London. BLENCH, R.1998. The status of the languages of Central Nigeria. In BRENZINGER, M. (ed.). Endangered languages in Africa. Köln : Rüdiger Köppe

Verlag pp.187-205.

BLOMFIELD, L. 1933. Language. New York: Henry Holt.

BOUM, M.A. 1980. “Le groupe memchoum: morphologie nominale’’. In HYMAN, L (ed.).

Noun classes in the Grassfields Bantu borderland. SCOPIL.

BOT BA NJOCK, H. M. 1970. Nexus et nominaux en basaa. Thèse de Doctorat d’Etat. Sorbonne, Paris.

BROSNAHAN, L. F. 1963. Some Historical Cases of Language Imposition in J. Spencer,(ed.).

Language in Africa; Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp.7-24.

BUILLES, J. M .1996. Manuel de linguistique descriptive : le point de vue fonctionnaliste.

Nathan, Paris.

BYBEE, J, L, R. PERKINS, and W. PAGLIUCA. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

CAMPBELL, L., M. C. MUNTZEL. 1989. “The structural consequences of language death”. In Nancy C.

Dorian (ed.). Investigating obsolescence [:] studies in language contraction and death. 181-96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

CAMEROON. 1996. Loi n°96/06 du janvier 1996 portant révision de a Constitution de la République du Cameroun du 02 juin 1972.

CAMEROON. 2008. Loi n°2008/001 du 14 avril 2008 modifiant et complétant certaines dispositions de la loi n°96/06 du 18 janvier 1996 portant révision de la constitution de la République du Cameroun du 02 juin 1972. Yaoundé.

CAPO HOUNKPATI, B.C. 1988. “The Neo- Language Approach to Orthography : The case of Gbe”, in Bergman, Ted (ed.), 1988 : Proceedings of the Round Table on Assuring the feasibility of Standardization within Dialect Chains, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands, SIL Africa Area, Kenya, Naïrobi : 31-62

CHIATOH, B. AGHA-AH. 2004. Assessing community response in a multilingual context: the case of Cameroon. Ph.D. thesis, University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé.

CHOMSKY, N. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT press.

---------------------.1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.

---------------------.1975. Reflections on language. New York: Pantheon Books.

---------------------.1982. Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding.

Cambridge, MIT Press.

CHOMSKY, N., M. HALLE. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row. xiv, 470 pages. Reprinted 1991, Boston: MIT Press.

COMRIE, B.1976. Aspect. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

-----------------.1990. Tense and aspect in eight Cameroonian languages. SIL.

CONNER, M. L. 1997/2004. "Andragogy and Pedagogy." Ageless Learners.

COOPER, R. L. 1989. Language Planning and Social Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

CORDER, S.P. 1973. Introducing Applied linguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

CRISTAL, D. 1997. The Cambridge encyclopedia of language. 2ⁿᵈ ed, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

CUMMINS, J.1979. Cognitive/academics language proficiency, linguistic interdependence, the optimum age question and some other matters.Working Paper on Bilingualism19, 121-129.

DAY, R.S. 2003. “3D interactive visual simulations (VR) as an aid to learning in Africa : the global approach to teaching and learning. UNESCO document, UNESCO, Paris.

DIBWA DIMBELE, J. 2007. La morphologie nominale du kwàkùm. FALSH Université de Yaoundé I, Yaoundé.

Published

July 4, 2023

Series