Readings in Methodology: African Perspectives
Mots-clés :
Lectures, methodologie, objectivation scientifique, epistemologiqueSynopsis
One of the weaknesses of research in Africa is the little consideration that is given to questions of epistemology and methodology. What we see is the trivialization of research protocols which, consequently, are reduced to fantasy prescriptions that detach social studies from universal debates over the validity of science rather than an interrogation of research procedures induced by the complexity of social dynamics. As a result, social sciences have become an imitative discourse and a recital of exotic anecdotes without perspectives. Knowledge production therefore loses any heuristic bearing. It is on the basis of this reality that attempts to correct this tendency have been made in this book by discussing the methodological foundation of social science knowledge.
This volume is a collection of papers presented during methodological workshops organized by CODESRIA. Its objective is to revitalize theory and methodology in field work in Africa while contributing to the creation of a critical space hinged upon the mastery of epistemological bases which are indispensable to any scientific imagination.
Far from being a collection of technical certainties and certified methods, this book interrogates the uncertain itinerary of the process of social logics discovery. In that sense, it is a decisive step towards a critical systemization of ongoing theories and practices within the African scientific community. The reader can, therefore, identify the philosophical, historical, sociological and anthropological foundations of object construction, field data exploitation and research results delivery. This book explains the importance of the philosophical and social modalities of scientific practice, the influence of local historical contexts, the different usages of new investigative tools, including the audiovisual tools. Finally, the book, backed by classical theories, serves as an invitation toward considering scientific commitment to African field research from a reflective perspective.
Chapitres
-
Prelim
-
Introduction: Questions of Method
-
Pragmatism as a Vision of the World and as a Method: A Philosophical Examination of the Challenges Presented to Contemporary Social Research by Subjective Idealism
-
The Alchemist and the Apprentice Myth-Hunter, Comments on Social Engineering in African Social Sciences
-
An Introduction to the Epistemology of the Social Sciences
-
Reasons and Causes: Wittgenstein versus the Myth of Causal Explanation in the Social Sciences
-
Scientific Logics and Methodologies
-
Construction of the Subject as a Pratice of Clarificaton of Social Relationships
-
Moroccan Sociology: Epistemological Preliminaries
-
Autochthones Making their Realities Strange in Order to Better Understand Them
-
Life History and the Writing of Ethnography: The Case of Morocco
-
Audiovisual Instruments in Ethnographic Research
-
Establishing an Observation, Producing a Discourse, Illustrating Results Possibilities for the Photographic Tool
-
Comparison: A Founding Approach in the Social Sciences
-
Writing in the Social Sciences: From Field Notes to Scientific Reports
Téléchargements
Références
Anderson, Elijah, 1999, Code of the Streets. Decency, Violence and the Moral Life of the Inner City, New York: Norton.
Beaud, Stéphane and Weber, Florence, 2003, “ Écrire un compte rendu d’enquête [“ Writing a Research Report”], in Guide de l’enquête de terrain [Guide to Research in the Field], Paris: La Découverte, Guides Repères, pp. 279-287.
Becker, Howard S., 2004, Écrire les sciences sociales. Commencer et terminer son article, sa thèse ou son livre, French translation. Paris: Economica, “ Méthodes des sciences sociales “Social Science Methods” ”, (Writing for Social Scientists : How to Start and Finish Your Thesis, Book, or Article, Chicago Guides to Writing, Editing, and Publishing, 1986).
Becker, Howard S., 2002, Les ficelles du métier, Comment conduire sa recherche en sciences sociales?
French translation, Paris: La Découverte, Guides Repères, (Tricks of the Trade. How to Think about Your Research While You’re doing It? University of Chicago Press, 1998).
Becker, Howard S., 1986, Outsiders. Études de sociologie de la deviance, Paris: Métailié, (Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: The Free Press, 1963).
Burawoy, Michael, 2003, “ L’étude de cas élargie. Une approche réflexive, historique et comparée de l’enquête de terrain”, in Cefaï, D. (ed.), L’enquête de terrain [Field Research], Paris : La Découverte, pp. 425-464 (“The Extended Case Method. A Reflexive, Historical and Comparative Approach to Field Work”, Sociological Theory, vol. 16, n°1, 1998, pp. 4-33).
Cefaï, Daniel, ed., 2003, L’enquête de terrain [Field Research], Paris: La Découverte, “Research”.
Cefaï, Daniel, 2007, “Vers un nouveau désordre mondial : politique comparée et anthropologie pluraliste selon Clifford Geertz “Towards a New Global Disorder : comparative policy and pluralistic anthropology according to Clifford Geertz”, Critique Internationale, vol. 36, n°3, pp. 169-180.
Charmaz, Kathy, 2001, “Grounded Theory”, in Emerson R. M. (ed.), Contemporary Field Research. Perspectives and Formulations, Long Grove, Waveland, pp. 335-352.
Clifford, James, [1983], “De l’autorité en ethnographie. Le récit anthropologique comme texte littéraire, ” in Cefaï, D., L’enquête de terrain, op. cit., pp. 263-294. (“On Ethnographic Authority. The Anthropological Narrative as Literary Text”), Representations, vol. 1, n°2).
Clifford, James, Marcus, George E., ed., 1986, Writing Culture: the Poetics and Politics of Ethnography, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Dewey, John, 1993, Logique. Théorie de l’enquête [Logic. Theory of Research], Paris: PUF (1938).
Duneier, Mitchell, Hasan, Hakim, 1999, Sidewalk, New York Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.
Duneier, Mitchell, , 2006, “ Garder sa tête sur le ring ? Sur la négligence théorique et autres écueils de l’ethnographie” [“Keeping One’s Head on the Ring? On theoretical negligance and other Ethnographical Pitfalls”], Revue française de sociologie [French Review of Sociology], vol. 47, n°1.
Elias N., 1993, Qu’est-ce que la sociologie ?[What Is Sociology ?], Paris: Éditions de l’Aube/Pocket (1970).
Emerson, Robert M., 1995, Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes, Chicago The University of Chicago Press.
Emerson, Robert M. ed., 2001, Contemporary Field Research, Perspectives and Formulations, Long Grove: Waveland Press.
Fraenkel, Béatrice, , 2001, “ Enquêter sur les écrits dans l’organisation [“ Research on Writings on Organization”] ”, in Borzeix A., Fraenkel, B., ed., Langage et Travail. Communication, cognition, action [Language and Work. Communication, Cognition, Action], Paris: CNRS Éditions.
Geertz, Clifford, 1998, “La description dense. Vers une théorie interprétative de la culture” [“Dense Description. For an Interpretative Theory of Culture”], Enquête, n°6, Dossier “La description 1” (chap 1 in The Interpretation of Culture, New York, Basic Books, 1973).
Goody, Jack, 1979, La raison graphique. La domestication de la pensée sauvage, Paris: Minuit, (The Domestication of the Savage Mind, Cambridge University Press, 1977).